header-logo header-logo

Mind (the SRA) insurance gaps

12 January 2024 / Frank Maher
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
152835
A resolution worth keeping…spotting gaps in your firm’s insurance policy. Frank Maher sets out where you might slip up

It is often said that solicitors in England & Wales have the widest cover of any profession in the world due to the breadth of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Minimum Terms and Conditions (MTC), so how do firms sometimes find themselves facing claims for which they are not covered? Below are some examples from cases where the writer has acted for firms, most with happy outcomes.

Policy limit

Claims over the policy limit are surprisingly rare in practice, but insurers and brokers are generally reporting increasing numbers. The compulsory cover is £3m per claim for LLPs, limited companies and ABSs, £2m for sole practitioners and partnerships. Many firms have additional cover, but it will not be as comprehensive. The policy limit includes claimants’ costs; costs inflation, partly due to onerous disclosure obligations, is fuelling the problem. Perhaps the most common policy limit problem in practice is aggregation (see below).

Claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll