header-logo header-logo

04 September 2015 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Mind the trips & slips (Pt 3)

nlj_7666_backpage

HHJ Simon Brown tussles with time for costs & consequential orders

At 3.30pm I gave judgment for the claimant for £1,250 (50% contributory negligence). CPR 28.6.5 estimates that there are 30 minutes to go for “costs and consequential orders”. We shall see, and only the defendant’s counsel had brought a White Book with him.

Statements of costs

The court clerk then handed me the statement of costs (summary assessment) filed by the claimants correctly more than two days before the trial (CPR 28.6.6). Ironically, I already had the defendant’s statement because it was filed out of time to the wrong court section marked “urgent” so that someone brought it to my chambers shortly before the hearing! They were in a form that I was familiar with but not in the Precedent H format that is easier to fathom how and why costs are incurred. Anyway, I looked at the grand totals:…wait for it…£5,353 (defendant)…and….£33,065 (claimant)!

Successful party?

Both parties claimed to be the “successful” one! As a first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll