header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008 / Hina Majid
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

A minefield of confusion

Hina Majid on the government’s probationary citizenship proposals

Integration, international competitiveness, clarity of laws and efficient administration are all laudable aims and the government is right to pursue these objectives in redesigning its scheme for settlement and naturalisation. However, the fundamental problem with its current proposals is that they are unlikely to achieve any of the above.

The Draft (Partial) Immigration and Citizenship Bill’s key innovation, as regards citizenship, is to reflect the creation of a new “probationary citizenship” status. This is to be interposed between temporary leave and British citizenship. Although not presently stated in the Bill, the intention is that probationary citizenship will carry only limited access to the welfare state. In progressing from probationary to British citizenship, the key change is that economic migrants will be required to demonstrate that they have been in continuous employment, complying with certain, as yet unspecified, conditions. Partners and spouses will also be required to establish that they are in an ongoing relationship.

Time frames for naturalising
In terms of the time frames, probationary citizenship is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

Ling Ong, partner at Weightmans and president of London Market FOIL, discusses her biggest inspirations, the challenges of AI and the importance of tackling unconscious bias

DWF—Imogen Francis

DWF—Imogen Francis

Director and head of IP team joins in Birmingham

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Firm boosts partnership and costs practice with five senior promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll