header-logo header-logo

18 February 2019
Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Miner’s case not a ‘trial within a trial’

Solicitors have welcomed a Supreme Court decision on professional negligence and causation, in a case brought by a retired miner.

In Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5 last week, Mr Perry lost his action against a now defunct law firm for failing to advise him that he was eligible for a services award from the National Coal Board as well as a general damages award for a workplace injury, Vibration White Finger.

The Justices unanimously held in favour of Raleys Solicitors, which went into administration in March 2016.

The Supreme Court agreed with the trial judge that, although the firm failed to advise Mr Perry, a miner, of the potential award, the negligent advice did not cause him any loss as his injury was not debilitating enough for him to make an honest claim for a services award, which required him to show he could no longer carry out tasks such as washing windows. The Justices overturned the Court of Appeal’s ruling that the trial judge had wrongly conducted ‘a trial with a trial’.

BLM’s Jason Nash, partner, and Richard Gould, associate, who acted for Raleys Solicitors (in administration), said: ‘Dishonest claims of course come in a variety of different guises.

‘For those seeking to fairly resist such claims it’s welcome that the Supreme Court has made the clearest of statements to discourage their prosecution.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll