header-logo header-logo

18 February 2019
Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Miner’s case not a ‘trial within a trial’

Solicitors have welcomed a Supreme Court decision on professional negligence and causation, in a case brought by a retired miner.

In Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5 last week, Mr Perry lost his action against a now defunct law firm for failing to advise him that he was eligible for a services award from the National Coal Board as well as a general damages award for a workplace injury, Vibration White Finger.

The Justices unanimously held in favour of Raleys Solicitors, which went into administration in March 2016.

The Supreme Court agreed with the trial judge that, although the firm failed to advise Mr Perry, a miner, of the potential award, the negligent advice did not cause him any loss as his injury was not debilitating enough for him to make an honest claim for a services award, which required him to show he could no longer carry out tasks such as washing windows. The Justices overturned the Court of Appeal’s ruling that the trial judge had wrongly conducted ‘a trial with a trial’.

BLM’s Jason Nash, partner, and Richard Gould, associate, who acted for Raleys Solicitors (in administration), said: ‘Dishonest claims of course come in a variety of different guises.

‘For those seeking to fairly resist such claims it’s welcome that the Supreme Court has made the clearest of statements to discourage their prosecution.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll