header-logo header-logo

18 February 2019
Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Miner’s case not a ‘trial within a trial’

Solicitors have welcomed a Supreme Court decision on professional negligence and causation, in a case brought by a retired miner.

In Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5 last week, Mr Perry lost his action against a now defunct law firm for failing to advise him that he was eligible for a services award from the National Coal Board as well as a general damages award for a workplace injury, Vibration White Finger.

The Justices unanimously held in favour of Raleys Solicitors, which went into administration in March 2016.

The Supreme Court agreed with the trial judge that, although the firm failed to advise Mr Perry, a miner, of the potential award, the negligent advice did not cause him any loss as his injury was not debilitating enough for him to make an honest claim for a services award, which required him to show he could no longer carry out tasks such as washing windows. The Justices overturned the Court of Appeal’s ruling that the trial judge had wrongly conducted ‘a trial with a trial’.

BLM’s Jason Nash, partner, and Richard Gould, associate, who acted for Raleys Solicitors (in administration), said: ‘Dishonest claims of course come in a variety of different guises.

‘For those seeking to fairly resist such claims it’s welcome that the Supreme Court has made the clearest of statements to discourage their prosecution.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll