header-logo header-logo

06 August 2025
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Legal News , Transport , Tax , Local government
printer mail-detail

Minicabs soar past Uber’s roadblock

Private hire vehicle companies have seen off Uber’s legal challenge to their business models, in a landmark Supreme Court decision

The court unanimously rejected Uber’s argument that private hire operators enter into individual contracts of hire with passengers, which would have resulted in VAT being charged on all fares, in DELTA Merseyside and Veezu Holdings v Uber Britannia [2025] UKSC 31. Consequently, the private hire companies can continue to operate as agents for their drivers.

DELTA had warned the extra 20% on fares would make them unaffordable for many passengers, with ‘seismic consequences’ for the industry as well as increased costs for the NHS, education authorities and other public bodies.

DELTA successfully argued that the regulatory regime outside London and Plymouth laid down in Part II of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 allows for multiple business models. The court agreed that, while Uber’s model does trigger VAT liability, competitors can lawfully operate using alternative structures that do not.

Layla Barke Jones, partner at Aaron & Partners, representing DELTA, said: ‘This ruling ensures that operators can continue to operate under established, regulated models that have been in existence since regulation was introduced almost half a century ago.

‘Private hire firms are vital in the communities, and are used frequently by those with disabilities, low-income households and older people who rely on taxis for essential journeys and to maintain their independence. If VAT suddenly had to be paid by all those people, the additional cost would have meant many simply choose not to travel at all, leaving some of the most vulnerable people in our society isolated.

‘A crisis has been averted.’

Nia Cooper, chief legal officer at Veezu, said the ruling ‘confirms that operators can continue to choose which business model they adopt to run their business’ and also ‘shows that British-owned businesses can stand up against global giants that attempt to use litigation as a tactic to shape the sector to suit their business model’.

Issue: 8128 / Categories: Legal News , Transport , Tax , Local government
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll