header-logo header-logo

17 July 2014
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Minimum income challenge fails

The Court of Appeal has rejected a legal challenge against Home Office rules that British citizens must demonstrate an income of at least £18,600 per annum before they can sponsor a foreign spouse from outside the EEA.

Ruling unanimously in MM (Lebanon) & Ors v Home Secretary [2014] EWCA Civ 985, the court found the requirements were lawful.

Delivering the leading judgment, Lord Justice Aikens said: “The question is whether the fact that the new mininum income requirement (MIR) has the effect of treating different national, ethnic, racial or sexual groups differently has a legitimate aim and there is a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised.

“There can be no doubt that the aims of new MIR, viz to reduce the burden on the state and to encourage integration, are legitimate.”

Issue: 7615 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll