header-logo header-logo

17 March 2022
Issue: 7971 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Minimum offer may not placate criminal lawyers

Ministers have offered a rise of 15% (an extra £135m) in legal aid fees for criminal defence―the minimum recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid―but it may not be enough to avert strike action by barristers

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) published its response to Sir Christopher Bellamy QC’s Review this week, along with plans to reform the system. The consultation paper had not yet been published at the time of going to press but proposals include removing the financial cap on eligibility for Crown Court defendants (the ‘innocence tax’), restructuring the fee scheme, providing funding for training and removing barriers for CILEX Lawyers.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘It is disappointing that the fee increases will be delayed for a few months more after so many years of waiting and it remains to be seen whether the investment will be enough to halt the exodus from criminal defence work, but we hope this injection of cash can begin to turn the tide.’

However, a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) ballot of members returned this week showed more than 94% in favour of refusing to accept return work under the Advocates’ Graduated Fees Scheme from 11 April onwards, if fee increases were delayed until September.

In a statement published after the government’s response to the Review, CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Our members have already made it clear that the suggested increase in fees by Sir Christopher Bellamy will not be sufficient to retain enough criminal barristers to keep the wheels of justice turning and that means victims will be failed.’

The MoJ also proposes raising the income and capital legal aid thresholds to include a further two million people, removing the means test for some victims of domestic abuse, providing free legal representation for all under-18s and for parents challenging doctors over withdrawal of their child’s life support, and providing free legal help for families at inquests where there has been a potential human rights breach.

Bar Council chair Mark Fenhalls QC said: ‘These proposals will help the most vulnerable have access to justice.’

Issue: 7971 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll