header-logo header-logo

Miscarriage of justice ruling

30 January 2019
Issue: 7826 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Convictions quashed but no compensation for wrongful imprisonment

Miscarriage of justice victims Sam Hallam and Victor Nealon, who spent time in prison after being wrongly convicted, have lost their appeals at the Supreme Court.

Hallam spent seven years, and Nealon 17 years, in prison for crimes they did not commit. In both cases, their convictions were eventually quashed in light of new evidence.

Both men applied for compensation but were refused by the justice secretary on the grounds the new evidence did not show beyond reasonable doubt that they did not commit the crimes, as required by s 133, Criminal Justice Act 1988.

The men argued that the s 133 requirement is incompatible with the presumption of innocence in the European Convention on Human Rights.

However, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a 5-2 majority (Lords Reed and Kerr dissenting), in R (Hallam) & Anor v Secretary of State for Justice [2019] UKSC 2.

Emily Bolton, legal director at the Centre for Criminal Appeals, a charity that works on miscarriages of justice cases, said: ‘The Supreme Court was wrong not to declare this shameful law incompatible with the presumption of innocence.

‘Miscarriages of justice destroy lives. The government should act to ensure all miscarriage of justice victims get the apologies they deserve as well as the support they need to help rebuild their lives.’

Meanwhile, the Law Society has warned that criminal justice is in crisis after ‘years of neglect’. Vice president Simon Davis said people accused of crimes have a diminishing chance of a fair trial and victims have a reduced chance of seeing justice.

‘In our country, people are innocent until proven guilty after a fair trial—yet those accused are forced through a frequently unfair and nightmarish journey through the criminal justice system regardless of whether they are guilty or not.’

He highlighted a series of problems, including a shortage of criminal duty solicitors, ‘swathes of court closures’, repeatedly adjourned trials, barriers to legal aid access, failures to disclose crucial material from criminal investigations and ‘defendants on low incomes forced to pay fees they can’t afford’.

Issue: 7826 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll