header-logo header-logo

Misconduct in public office: time for change

03 March 2021 / Aziz Rahman
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
41389
Aziz Rahman discusses the need for clarity on a centuries-old offence which remains as ambiguous as it is confusing

The fact that the Law Commission has made proposals for changes to the offence of misconduct in public office is obviously newsworthy. But, for two reasons, it should not be considered surprising.

For one, the proposals are the result of a lengthy and well-publicised consultation. There was always going to be something put forward by the commission after it had completed its in-depth review. Secondly, the offence of misconduct in public office has arguably been in need of reform for years. As the commission itself has said, the offence has for a long time been viewed as being poorly defined. The fact that the government, the Court of Appeal, commentators and academics have been critics of it is a clear indicator of its shortcomings—and the need for changes.

The need for reform

Misconduct in public office is a common law offence. For a successful prosecution, it must be shown

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll