header-logo header-logo

03 March 2021 / Aziz Rahman
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Misconduct in public office: time for change

41389
Aziz Rahman discusses the need for clarity on a centuries-old offence which remains as ambiguous as it is confusing

The fact that the Law Commission has made proposals for changes to the offence of misconduct in public office is obviously newsworthy. But, for two reasons, it should not be considered surprising.

For one, the proposals are the result of a lengthy and well-publicised consultation. There was always going to be something put forward by the commission after it had completed its in-depth review. Secondly, the offence of misconduct in public office has arguably been in need of reform for years. As the commission itself has said, the offence has for a long time been viewed as being poorly defined. The fact that the government, the Court of Appeal, commentators and academics have been critics of it is a clear indicator of its shortcomings—and the need for changes.

The need for reform

Misconduct in public office is a common law offence. For a successful prosecution, it must be shown

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll