header-logo header-logo

Misconduct in public office: time for change

03 March 2021 / Aziz Rahman
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
41389
Aziz Rahman discusses the need for clarity on a centuries-old offence which remains as ambiguous as it is confusing

The fact that the Law Commission has made proposals for changes to the offence of misconduct in public office is obviously newsworthy. But, for two reasons, it should not be considered surprising.

For one, the proposals are the result of a lengthy and well-publicised consultation. There was always going to be something put forward by the commission after it had completed its in-depth review. Secondly, the offence of misconduct in public office has arguably been in need of reform for years. As the commission itself has said, the offence has for a long time been viewed as being poorly defined. The fact that the government, the Court of Appeal, commentators and academics have been critics of it is a clear indicator of its shortcomings—and the need for changes.

The need for reform

Misconduct in public office is a common law offence. For a successful prosecution, it must be shown

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll