header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Dr Srikanth Nimmagadda , Dr Chris Jones
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Misrepresentation

Public bodies are too often represented by unqualified people say Dr Chris Jones and Dr Srikanth Nimmagadda

Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) proceedings are proceedings of the High Court that determine the liberty of patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 (MeHA 1983). There are usually two parties to the proceedings: the patient and the “responsible authority”—the managers of the NHS trust or private hospital in which the patient is detained. Patients are usually represented by a lawyer specialising in mental health law. In contrast, legal representation for the hospital is rare. Generally the responsible medical officer (RMO)—the consultant in charge of the patient’s treatment—represents the hospital. This is no longer automatically the case (see R (on application of Care NHS Trust) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2003] EWHC 1182 (Admin), [2003] All ER (D) 120 (May)), but it remains common. Consultant psychiatrists receive no specific training in the responsibilities arising from this role, although many gain considerable practical experience of the proceedings. Similarly, psychiatrists have no training in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carter-Ruck—Tomas Vail

Carter-Ruck—Tomas Vail

Carter-Ruck strengthens International team with appointment of arbitration partner Tomas Vail

Slater Heelis—Nick Terry

Slater Heelis—Nick Terry

Slater Heelis strengthens crime and regulatory team with appointment of Nick Terry as partner

Payne Hicks Beach—Thomas Moran & Sarah Gogan

Payne Hicks Beach—Thomas Moran & Sarah Gogan

Payne Hicks Beach strengthens private wealth offering with appointment of two new partners

NEWS
Expert witnesses face a multitude of risks and uncertainties when using artificial intelligence (AI) in their reports, IT specialists have warned
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has accepted Richard Lloyd’s recommendations for the Legal Services Board (LSB) and ordered a ‘comprehensive review of the regulatory framework’, likely to continue beyond 2029
More than one-third of expert witnesses now use artificial intelligence (AI) regularly or occasionally in their work, according to Bond Solon’s 2026 expert witness survey
General counsel have warned law firms not to keep artificial intelligence (AI) savings to themselves or risk losing work
Some 53 firms have been successfully assessed for legal aid contracts for inquest work and will now move to the verification stage, the Legal Aid Agency has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll