header-logo header-logo

Modern moneylending & misery

192559
Secured loans based on sham authorisation: Fred Philpott explains the shady world of illegal lending
  • Analysis of cases that have dealt with unauthorised secured loans, setting out the strategies often used, and the consequences for both lenders and borrowers.

Over recent years, a financial industry has operated whereby some businesses lend money secured on people’s homes without authorisation. A recent Court of Appeal case illustrates some of the subterfuges that can be used.

The background

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) introduced a scheme of authorisation which was required lawfully to carry out certain financial services activities including, in general terms, granting credit secured on domestic property resulting in a regulated mortgage contract (see the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (SI 2001/544) (RAO 2001), art 61).

The origin of requiring official approval (registration) to grant credit is to be found in the Moneylenders Act 1900. These provisions were replaced by the Moneylenders Act 1927, which provided for a scheme of licensing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll