header-logo header-logo

Modern moneylending & misery

192559
Secured loans based on sham authorisation: Fred Philpott explains the shady world of illegal lending
  • Analysis of cases that have dealt with unauthorised secured loans, setting out the strategies often used, and the consequences for both lenders and borrowers.

Over recent years, a financial industry has operated whereby some businesses lend money secured on people’s homes without authorisation. A recent Court of Appeal case illustrates some of the subterfuges that can be used.

The background

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) introduced a scheme of authorisation which was required lawfully to carry out certain financial services activities including, in general terms, granting credit secured on domestic property resulting in a regulated mortgage contract (see the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (SI 2001/544) (RAO 2001), art 61).

The origin of requiring official approval (registration) to grant credit is to be found in the Moneylenders Act 1900. These provisions were replaced by the Moneylenders Act 1927, which provided for a scheme of licensing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll