header-logo header-logo

MoJ sets out detail on Jackson

20 February 2013
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rules for the implementation of Jackson reforms laid in Parliament

The Ministry of Justice has laid out its rules for the implementation of the Jackson reforms. The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013 (SI 2013/262), laid in Parliament last week, cover the bulk of Lord Justice Jackson’s civil justice reforms, including the introduction of qualified one way costs shifting (QOCS), damages-based agreements and tighter costs management.

Any party which fails to file a budget despite being required to do so will be treated “as having filed a budget comprising only the applicable court fees”.

Courts must in future deal with cases “at proportionate cost”, apply new rules on Pt 36 awards, and require parties to provide an upfront estimate of the costs of expert witnesses.

Julian Chamberlayne, head of the travel law team and partner at Stewarts Law, says that the biggest surprise in the new CPR for personal injury and clinical negligence lawyers is that the QOCS exceptions will still “expose successful claimants to interlocutory, issue based or proportional costs awards, but only up to the level of damages and interest awarded”.

“All prior indications were that this particular chink in the QOCS armour would only relate to successful Pt 36 offers by defendants. After the event insurers have been slow to reveal the detail of their post-Jackson products and there is no sign that they had anticipated a need to provide cover for interlocutory, issue based or proportional costs awards.

“The inevitable result is that finalisation and pricing of the new ATE products will go even closer to the wire. In catastrophic injury cases, the combination of these risks could result in cost liabilities of several hundred thousand pounds.”

The new rules come into effect on 1 April.

Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll