header-logo header-logo

Money laundering crackdown

30 October 2019
Issue: 7862 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Criminal , Fraud , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Poor processes open the door to money launderers, warns SRA

One in five law firms is failing to comply with anti-money laundering rules, regulators have warned.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) asked 400 firms for their risk assessments, to assess whether they were complying with the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. However, 83 of the firms (21%) were not compliant. They either did not address all the risk areas required (43), or they sent over something other than a firm risk assessment (40), such as a client or matter risk assessment.

The majority of firms (64%) were using templates, and their risk assessments were generally of lower quality. The SRA said that, while templates can be helpful, too many firms take a ‘copy and paste’ approach, without thinking through the specific risks and issues faced by their firm.

The SRA also expressed concern that 135 of the risk assessments (38%) were dated recently, suggesting some firms may have created one in response to the SRA’s request rather than having one already made.

Consequently, the SRA is now writing to all 7,000 firms affected by the regulations to ask them to confirm they have a firm risk assessment in place. It aims to carry out an ‘extensive programme of targeted, in-depth visits’ to firms to ensure the profession is complying with the rules.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Money laundering supports criminal activity such as people trafficking, drug smuggling and terrorism.

‘The damage money laundering does to society means that every solicitor must be fully committed to preventing it. The vast majority would never intend to get involved in criminal activities, but poor processes open the door to money launderers. A call from us should not be the prompt for a firm to get their act together.

‘You need to take immediate action now if you are not on top of your money laundering risks. Where we have serious concerns, we will take strong action.’

The SRA’s annual Risk Outlook, published this week, shows it has opened 172 anti-money laundering compliance investigations already this year. In the past five years, the SRA has taken more than 60 such cases to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, and more than 40 solicitors have been struck-off or suspended as a result.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll