header-logo header-logo

30 June 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Money laundering fines

Three law firms have been fined for taking more than a year to comply with their anti-money laundering (AML) obligations

The action marks the start of enforcement action by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) against firms that delay compliance with the amended Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017.

The regulations require firms to carry out a firm-wide money laundering risk assessment. Criminals use property sales and corporate vehicles to hide illicit funds.

In 2019, the SRA reviewed compliance at 400 law firms and found many of them carried out poor quality risk assessments or none at all. It wrote to all firms requiring the compliance officer for legal practice to sign a declaration confirming the practice had a firm-wide risk assessment. The deadline for responses was 31 January 2020.

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll