header-logo header-logo

Money laundering: Get it right or face a fine

25 October 2023
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
Solicitors could face fines in future if their money laundering checks are found to be too lax

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) revealed last week it will consult next year on introducing fixed financial penalties for anti-money laundering (AML) systems and controls failings, for example, not undertaking a matter risk assessment.

However, Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘The SRA has implied that solicitors could possibly face unlimited fines by the regulator for all sorts of misdemeanours going forward.

‘However, the regulator fails to present a compelling argument for such a change. We are concerned that through its proposals the SRA could become the investigator, prosecutor and judge.’

Amy Bell, chair of the Law Society’s money laundering taskforce, added: ‘Enforcement must be truly risk-based and not arbitrary in nature.

‘Otherwise, this drives firms to deploy disproportionate processes, putting pressure on small firms in particular and driving up costs.’

Spot checks carried out on 30 firms found two firms did not have a process for carrying out risk assessments on clients and client matters, the SRA reported last week. The two firms have been referred to the SRA’s AML investigation team.

Of the remaining 28 firms, moreover, a ‘large proportion’ were found only to be partially compliant with AML regulations because their risk assessment process was not being used properly.

Most of the firms considered client and matter risk together in a single document, but failed to complete them comprehensively. One firm’s assessment of risk was limited to client risk only, and three firms’ risk assessment processes were limited to considering matter specific risks.

When reviewing the firms’ client files, the SRA found less than half had actual documented client/matter assessments. Moreover, of those who did, a quarter had not been done properly.

The SRA issued a warning notice to all firms, and has posted its review on its website along with a template and supporting notes to help firms with compliance.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘What’s clear from our thematic review is that firms are well aware of what is required of them, but aren’t getting it right on the ground.’

Issue: 8046 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll