header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-detail

Money laundering regime hampering UK business

Over regulation may put UK at competitive disadvantage

The private sector is being unnecessarily burdened by a duty to report minor regulatory breaches to the relevant authorities under the government’s money laundering and terrorist financing regime.

A report by the House of Lords EU Committee into the approach taken within the UK was critical of the “all crimes” regime currently in operation. Contrary to support from the British Bankers Association and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, the Law Society said in its evidence that a well regulated market is not necessarily being enhanced by the current system. Law Society president, Des Hudson, told the committee that the all-embracing definition of property resulted in the inclusion of criminal property deriving from a wide number of regulatory offences which could not have been intended to be within the focus of the strategy.

Hudson also raised the issue of the financial burden placed on the private sector by the anti-money laundering regime. Evidence presented to the committee suggested a disproportionate burden on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll