header-logo header-logo

18 June 2020
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Moore Barlow—Naomi Wilkes

Firm appoints new private wealth partner

Law firm Moore Barlow has announced the appointment of Naomi Wilkes as partner in the firm’s private wealth team.

Naomi is an experienced private client solicitor who provides specialised advice to individuals and families on issues such as wills, powers of attorney, estate administration, estate planning, tax planning including inheritance tax advice and the use of trusts. She is qualified by the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP), and is a member of Solicitors for the Elderly.

She joins Moore Barlow from Wiltshire firm Parker Bullen, where she was partner and head of department, dealing with all aspects of private client work including powers of attorney and Court of Protection applications.

Between 2009 and 2013, Naomi worked in-house as a product law specialist at Skandia International (now Quilter International), providing support for companies within their wealth management division on private client matters including international tax, trusts and inheritance tax. She also previously worked as part of the tax and trusts team at Moore Blatch.

Moore Barlow’s 40 strong private wealth team is headed by partner Tim Adams, and its wide-ranging expertise covers tax, wealth management and estate planning issues. They regularly work alongside the firm’s established family, residential property, rural services and contentious trusts and estates teams.

Tim Adams, partner at Moore Barlow, said: ‘We are pleased to welcome Naomi to our highly skilled private wealth team, which is now one of the largest private client advisory teams in the South East. She has a fantastic reputation and her arrival further demonstrates our commitment to maintaining our standing as a leading a firm for families and individuals across Hampshire, Surrey and London.’

Naomi said: ‘This is an incredibly exciting time for Moore Barlow, and I am delighted to become a part of its growing and ambitious private wealth team. With an excellent and established reputation, this move offers me a great platform to expand my practice further.’

Issue: 7892 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll