header-logo header-logo

Moore Barlow—Naomi Wilkes

18 June 2020
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Firm appoints new private wealth partner

Law firm Moore Barlow has announced the appointment of Naomi Wilkes as partner in the firm’s private wealth team.

Naomi is an experienced private client solicitor who provides specialised advice to individuals and families on issues such as wills, powers of attorney, estate administration, estate planning, tax planning including inheritance tax advice and the use of trusts. She is qualified by the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP), and is a member of Solicitors for the Elderly.

She joins Moore Barlow from Wiltshire firm Parker Bullen, where she was partner and head of department, dealing with all aspects of private client work including powers of attorney and Court of Protection applications.

Between 2009 and 2013, Naomi worked in-house as a product law specialist at Skandia International (now Quilter International), providing support for companies within their wealth management division on private client matters including international tax, trusts and inheritance tax. She also previously worked as part of the tax and trusts team at Moore Blatch.

Moore Barlow’s 40 strong private wealth team is headed by partner Tim Adams, and its wide-ranging expertise covers tax, wealth management and estate planning issues. They regularly work alongside the firm’s established family, residential property, rural services and contentious trusts and estates teams.

Tim Adams, partner at Moore Barlow, said: ‘We are pleased to welcome Naomi to our highly skilled private wealth team, which is now one of the largest private client advisory teams in the South East. She has a fantastic reputation and her arrival further demonstrates our commitment to maintaining our standing as a leading a firm for families and individuals across Hampshire, Surrey and London.’

Naomi said: ‘This is an incredibly exciting time for Moore Barlow, and I am delighted to become a part of its growing and ambitious private wealth team. With an excellent and established reputation, this move offers me a great platform to expand my practice further.’

Issue: 7892 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll