header-logo header-logo

01 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

More Crown Court days announced

Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to a Ministry of Justice decision to increase Crown Court sitting days

Lord Chancellor David Lammy confirmed this week the cap on sitting days will be raised from 110,000 to a total of 111,250 days next year.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, described the move as ‘a positive step’ but called for ‘no limit to the number of days that courts can sit’.

The Crown Court backlog has reached a record high of 78,329 cases, according to government statistics published last week, with some trial dates being set as far ahead as 2029. For comparison, the backlog stood at 38,000 cases in 2019.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said the increase was ‘a welcome step’ but called for long-term investment across the criminal justice system to get the service ‘back on its feet’.

Sitting days were capped at 105,000 in September 2024, but increased by 2,000 days in December and raised to 110,000 in March 2025.

Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll