header-logo header-logo

More delays to legal aid reforms

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

News

Changes to the criminal legal aid contract—due to be introduced in October—are to be further delayed until January 2008, the Legal Services Commission (LSC) says.

The news comes as the LSC confirms plans to appeal the judgment in the judicial review brought against the unified contract by the Law Society, R (on the application of the Law Society) v Legal Services Commission.
The LSC is disputing Mr Justice Beatson’s ruling that the LSC’s power to amend the “technical specifications” of the contract, such as peer review requirements and key performance indicators, breached EU law. 
Law Society president Andrew Holroyd says the LSC should now reconsider introducing civil contracts in October.

He says: “There is a significant threat that ploughing ahead with these changes will drive out good quality and well organised firms. There will be no legal aid lawyers to represent those that need it most. We call on the government to delay all the current changes, and to sit down with us to discuss whether there is a better way forward. It is not too late to sort this out to create a sustainable future for legal aid.”

The LSC admits confusion arising from the ruling was part of the reason for the delay to the criminal contract changes, but has pledged to introduce fixed fees for civil work in October 2007.

It says that, unlike the civil unified contract, the general criminal contract (GCC) was entered into some time before the legal aid reform programme was announced, therefore providers would not have been aware of the proposed reforms at the time they signed. Because of this and “the uncertainty arising from the unified contract judgment, the LSC will not now issue a notice of amendment”.

The LSC plans to terminate the existing GCC from 13 January 2008; award new contracts to operate for six months from 14 January 2008; and re-allocate duty solicitor work and issue rotas on that basis for the six months of the new contract.

Legal aid reforms for criminal work that were to be implemented between 15 October 2007 and 1 January 2008 will now be incorporated into the criminal contract to be introduced on 14 January 2008.

These include: the new police station fixed fees; expansion of the duty solicitor call centre and Criminal Defence Service Direct; and introduction of the very high cost case contracting panel.

The litigator graduated fee scheme is pencilled in for introduction at the same time, subject to the outcome of a consultation, and the unified contract for criminal legal aid services is planned for July 2008. 

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll