header-logo header-logo

22 July 2026
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Public
printer mail-detail

More judicial review reforms on the way?

The government is considering restricting judicial review challenges against housing schemes, motorways and other major planning applications

The proposals, launched in the last few days of Keir Starmer’s government, would extend judicial review reforms beyond Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) to major housing, transport and energy developments such as solar projects, road buildings and affordable homes. This will potentially save about six months of court time. Shorter deadlines for service of claims could also apply.

Judicial review was streamlined for NSIPs by the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025—NSIP cases skip the first paper permission stage of judicial review and move straight to an oral hearing, where a High Court judge can deem the complaint ‘totally without merit’ and refuse appeal.

The six-week consultation, ‘Judicial review reforms beyond Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects’, asks for views on what types of projects should be included. It closes on 27 August.

Courts minister Sarah Sackman said: ‘Judicial review will remain a vital safeguard, but it cannot be a vehicle for delay.’

Issue: 8171 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll