header-logo header-logo

22 September 2016 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Human rights
printer mail-detail

More questions than answers?

nlj_7715_robins

Jon Robins reviews the Lord Chancellor’s first outing before the House of Commons’ Justice Committee

There are only so many ways of saying “Can I get back to you on that?”. The new lord chancellor must have used every single one of them in a frustrating debut before the House of Commons’ Justice Committee earlier this month.

After all the harrumphing over the appropriateness or not of Liz Truss’s appointment as our first female lord chancellor—some fair, some not—you might have expected the minister to have spent the summer mugging up on her new brief.

If she had, there wasn’t much evidence of it. Much of the session was devoted to the MPs trying to get a handle on what the change in officeholder might mean for her predecessor’s plans for the biggest shake up of prisons since Victorian times.

Pressing issues

After thanking MPs for “the fantastic opportunity to set out my agenda”, Liz Truss confirmed that, yes, sorting out our prisons was “the most pressing issue”. The second key priority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll