header-logo header-logo

22 September 2016 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Human rights
printer mail-detail

More questions than answers?

nlj_7715_robins

Jon Robins reviews the Lord Chancellor’s first outing before the House of Commons’ Justice Committee

There are only so many ways of saying “Can I get back to you on that?”. The new lord chancellor must have used every single one of them in a frustrating debut before the House of Commons’ Justice Committee earlier this month.

After all the harrumphing over the appropriateness or not of Liz Truss’s appointment as our first female lord chancellor—some fair, some not—you might have expected the minister to have spent the summer mugging up on her new brief.

If she had, there wasn’t much evidence of it. Much of the session was devoted to the MPs trying to get a handle on what the change in officeholder might mean for her predecessor’s plans for the biggest shake up of prisons since Victorian times.

Pressing issues

After thanking MPs for “the fantastic opportunity to set out my agenda”, Liz Truss confirmed that, yes, sorting out our prisons was “the most pressing issue”. The second key priority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
back-to-top-scroll