header-logo header-logo

26 February 2014 / Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

More skeletons in the closet?

web_briggs

Business support may be the banks' next headache, says Aidan Briggs

Two recent reports—the RBS Independent Lending Review led by Andrew Large and Lawrence Tomlinson's Banks' Lending Practices: Treatment of Businesses in Distress —have sought to shed light on the "business support" measures imposed by lending banks upon small- and medium-sized enterprises in distress. Such behaviour has come to the fore in mis-selling litigation, as it tends to multiply the burden of interest rate hedging or other products upon struggling businesses.

The key issues

Both reports identify four key issues:

  • Lenders engineering “distress” in client businesses by restricting credit or arbitrarily revaluing assets (eg on a “fire sale” basis);
  • Business support imposing dramatic changes to lending terms by reason of that “distress”, accelerating the client’s decline;
  • Perverse incentives to push viable businesses into insolvency due to increased margins and fees; and
  • Conflicts of interest for bank-appointed valuers, accountants and managers with a view to future insolvency.

The frankly delicious facts of RBS v Highland Financial Securities [2013] EWCA Civ 328,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll