header-logo header-logo

More skeletons in the closet?

26 February 2014 / Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail
web_briggs

Business support may be the banks' next headache, says Aidan Briggs

Two recent reports—the RBS Independent Lending Review led by Andrew Large and Lawrence Tomlinson's Banks' Lending Practices: Treatment of Businesses in Distress —have sought to shed light on the "business support" measures imposed by lending banks upon small- and medium-sized enterprises in distress. Such behaviour has come to the fore in mis-selling litigation, as it tends to multiply the burden of interest rate hedging or other products upon struggling businesses.

The key issues

Both reports identify four key issues:

  • Lenders engineering “distress” in client businesses by restricting credit or arbitrarily revaluing assets (eg on a “fire sale” basis);
  • Business support imposing dramatic changes to lending terms by reason of that “distress”, accelerating the client’s decline;
  • Perverse incentives to push viable businesses into insolvency due to increased margins and fees; and
  • Conflicts of interest for bank-appointed valuers, accountants and managers with a view to future insolvency.

The frankly delicious facts of RBS v Highland Financial Securities [2013] EWCA Civ 328,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll