header-logo header-logo

More skeletons in the closet?

26 February 2014 / Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail
web_briggs

Business support may be the banks' next headache, says Aidan Briggs

Two recent reports—the RBS Independent Lending Review led by Andrew Large and Lawrence Tomlinson's Banks' Lending Practices: Treatment of Businesses in Distress —have sought to shed light on the "business support" measures imposed by lending banks upon small- and medium-sized enterprises in distress. Such behaviour has come to the fore in mis-selling litigation, as it tends to multiply the burden of interest rate hedging or other products upon struggling businesses.

The key issues

Both reports identify four key issues:

  • Lenders engineering “distress” in client businesses by restricting credit or arbitrarily revaluing assets (eg on a “fire sale” basis);
  • Business support imposing dramatic changes to lending terms by reason of that “distress”, accelerating the client’s decline;
  • Perverse incentives to push viable businesses into insolvency due to increased margins and fees; and
  • Conflicts of interest for bank-appointed valuers, accountants and managers with a view to future insolvency.

The frankly delicious facts of RBS v Highland Financial Securities [2013] EWCA Civ 328,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll