header-logo header-logo

26 January 2012 / Hugh Koch
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Expert Witness , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-detail

More than skin deep?

The psychological turmoil of breast implant removal & retention, by Hugh Koch Associates

Women with breast implants made by the French manufacturers Poly Implant Prosthèse (PIP) are commencing litigation in the UK. Anxiety levels have been raised by the French government with the recommendation that these implants are removed and key discussions are taking place as to the appropriate defendants in these cases (eg manufacturer, clinics, clinicians, hospital).

Many women with PIP implants will understandably be worried about the possible implications for their physical and emotional health. These factors need to be addressed with understanding and compassion by those responsible for their treatment and care. Where litigation is sensibly entered into, the initial focus would commonly be the physical consequences of the implant and its removal. However, it is important that the psychological side of implant removal (or lack of it) is also considered appropriately, both in terms of assessment and treatment.
A duty of care exists towards those who have sought breast implant surgery and now face the need for
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll