header-logo header-logo

El-Husseiny: more than an academic judgment?

04 April 2025 / Joseph Tendler , Daniel Warents
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insolvency , Property
printer mail-detail
214566
Joseph Tendler & Daniel Warents contemplate the future of s 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 after the most recent judgment in the El-Husseiny litigation
  • The El-Husseiny judgment is the first time that the Supreme Court has considered in detail the scope of s 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986, as well as ss 238 and 339.

Lady Rose and Lord Richards’ judgment in El-Husseiny and another v Invest Bank PSC [2025] UKSC 4 is as academic as it is important.

It is academic because by the time of its publication on 19 February 2025, Mr Justice Calver had already dismissed all of Invest Bank PSC’s claims under s 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 at trial on the basis that it had failed to establish that the debtor had acted for the purpose of prejudicing his creditors, as required by s 423(3) of the Act (see Invest Bank PSC v El-Husseini and others [2024] EWHC 2976 (Comm)).

At the same time, it is important

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll