header-logo header-logo

Mosley ruling will shackle free speech

31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Legal news

The High Court ruling that the News of the World (NoW) breached the privacy of F1 boss, Max Mosley, when it ran a story claiming that a sadomasochistic orgy he took part in had a Nazi theme, has “clapped legitimate investigative journalism in irons”, says media lawyer Mark Stephens.

Mr Justice Eady ruled that Mosley “had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to sexual activities (albeit unconventional) carried on between consenting adults on private property”.

There was no evidence, the judge said, that Mosley’s romp with five women “was intended to be an enactment of Nazi behaviour or adoption of any of its attitudes”, as intimated by the NoW.

The NoW faces a legal bill of almost £1m after the judge ordered it to pay damages and Mosley’s legal costs, plus its own.

Stephens, head of media at Finers Stephens Innocent, says: “Mr Justice Eady’s judgment makes a clear and unequivocal finding that there were no Nazi overtones to the S & M ‘scene’ captured on film by the NoW. This leaves the media trembling as Mr Mosley now threatens to wield the libel cane over the rest of the media who followed the NoW into this story. The name Mosley now, it seems, will be uttered in the same breath as McCann and Murat,” he adds.
 

Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll