header-logo header-logo

31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Mosley ruling will shackle free speech

Legal news

The High Court ruling that the News of the World (NoW) breached the privacy of F1 boss, Max Mosley, when it ran a story claiming that a sadomasochistic orgy he took part in had a Nazi theme, has “clapped legitimate investigative journalism in irons”, says media lawyer Mark Stephens.

Mr Justice Eady ruled that Mosley “had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to sexual activities (albeit unconventional) carried on between consenting adults on private property”.

There was no evidence, the judge said, that Mosley’s romp with five women “was intended to be an enactment of Nazi behaviour or adoption of any of its attitudes”, as intimated by the NoW.

The NoW faces a legal bill of almost £1m after the judge ordered it to pay damages and Mosley’s legal costs, plus its own.

Stephens, head of media at Finers Stephens Innocent, says: “Mr Justice Eady’s judgment makes a clear and unequivocal finding that there were no Nazi overtones to the S & M ‘scene’ captured on film by the NoW. This leaves the media trembling as Mr Mosley now threatens to wield the libel cane over the rest of the media who followed the NoW into this story. The name Mosley now, it seems, will be uttered in the same breath as McCann and Murat,” he adds.
 

Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Justine Howard

Charles Russell Speechlys—Justine Howard

Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

Gibson Dunn—Suzanne Thomson

Gibson Dunn—Suzanne Thomson

Gibson Dunn further bolsters business restructuring and reorganization practice in London

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Rachel Yao

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Rachel Yao

Penningtons Manches Cooper expands international private wealth practice with new Singapore partner

NEWS
Foreign judgment creditors have gained a route to recovery after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Drelle v Servis-Terminal
Surrogacy is growing in popularity, but parents-to-be face a complex legal framework
Winning a judgment may be only the beginning of an expensive enforcement battle, writes Professor Dominic Regan in this week's NLJ
Indemnity costs remain exceptional, but parties cannot ignore a case that deteriorates around them. In Lawrence v Associated Newspapers, Mr Justice Nicklin ordered the claimants to pay indemnity costs after finding their conduct, viewed cumulatively, fell ‘well outside the norm’
Public law is in flux following reversals and robust appellate intervention, according to the latest public law update by the team at HSFK for NLJ
back-to-top-scroll