header-logo header-logo

21 August 2014
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Move to clampdown on undeclared offshore income

HMRC is consulting on proposals to introduce a new criminal offence for those with off-shore tax accounts.

Details of the offence of failing to declare taxable off-shore income and gains is set out in an HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) consultation paper published this week, which asks for views on how the offence will be constructed and used by HMRC.

David Gauke, Financial Secretary to the Treasury, says: “Over 56,000 people have already told HMRC about what they owe offshore and HMRC has offered opportunities to clear things up as quickly and easily as possible. Those that don’t come forward must face tough consequences, including a criminal conviction.”

Although Peter Vaines, partner Squire Patton Boggs (UK) LLP agrees that there should be criminal penalties for people who evade taxes he has concerns about the route the Treasury has chosen: “HMRC have decided to introduce a new strict liability criminal offence of failing to declare an offshore account containing taxable income and gains.

“`Strict liability’ means that you are guilty even if there was no intention to commit the crime.So you are guilty and can be fined or sent to prison, merely for having money in an overseas account and not telling HMRC. There is no defence and no excuses.”

He adds, however, that with a little linguistic ambiguity, HMRC have suggested that there may be defences to this new offence:  “For example if the offshore account did not contain anything taxable. The funds might have arisen during a period of non residence or may have been a gift from a third party, or maybe the taxpayer is a non-dom and claiming the remittance basis.”

The majority of offshore cases will continue to be dealt with through a civil approach and a second paper sets out the government’s plans to introduce tougher civil sanctions for offshore evaders, including those who move their taxable assets between offshore banks in different countries in an attempt to hide their wealth and evade tax.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll