header-logo header-logo

MPs debate Brexit

15 November 2017
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

The government was facing difficulties this week in its efforts to fix the date of Brexit, as MPs began an eight-day debate on the EU Withdrawal Bill.

Conservative rebels included former attorney general Dominic Grieve, who called the amendment to fix the time of departure to 11pm on 29 March 2019 ‘so very strange, because it seems to me to fetter the government, to add nothing to the strength of the government’s negotiating position, and in fact potentially to create a very great problem that could be brought back to visit on us at a later stage.’

Former Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly warned he could ‘only see downsides’ to a fixed date. Ken Clarke MP called the amendment ‘utterly foolish’ since it closed down the possibility of any extension to the talks. However, Frank Field MP argued that setting a date ensured the UK rather than the EU sets the date for Brexit.

More than 470 amendments have been tabled. By the end of day one of the debate, the government had won the first five. These included an SNP amendment that the courts post-Brexit should pay due regard to relevant European Court of Justice decisions when interpreting retained EU law. They also included a Plaid Cymru amendment to give Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland a veto over Brexit, and a Labour amendment on how a transitional period would work.

Meanwhile, Justice minister Dominic Raab has confirmed that the government will table an amendment before report stage requiring ministers presenting any Brexit-related primary or secondary legislation to first make a statement on whether and how it is consistent with the Equalities Act.

Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll