header-logo header-logo

MPs debate Brexit

15 November 2017
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

The government was facing difficulties this week in its efforts to fix the date of Brexit, as MPs began an eight-day debate on the EU Withdrawal Bill.

Conservative rebels included former attorney general Dominic Grieve, who called the amendment to fix the time of departure to 11pm on 29 March 2019 ‘so very strange, because it seems to me to fetter the government, to add nothing to the strength of the government’s negotiating position, and in fact potentially to create a very great problem that could be brought back to visit on us at a later stage.’

Former Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly warned he could ‘only see downsides’ to a fixed date. Ken Clarke MP called the amendment ‘utterly foolish’ since it closed down the possibility of any extension to the talks. However, Frank Field MP argued that setting a date ensured the UK rather than the EU sets the date for Brexit.

More than 470 amendments have been tabled. By the end of day one of the debate, the government had won the first five. These included an SNP amendment that the courts post-Brexit should pay due regard to relevant European Court of Justice decisions when interpreting retained EU law. They also included a Plaid Cymru amendment to give Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland a veto over Brexit, and a Labour amendment on how a transitional period would work.

Meanwhile, Justice minister Dominic Raab has confirmed that the government will table an amendment before report stage requiring ministers presenting any Brexit-related primary or secondary legislation to first make a statement on whether and how it is consistent with the Equalities Act.

Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll