header-logo header-logo

28 February 2017
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

M&S PROFILE: Bryan Scant

bryan_scant.jld_chair

The new chair of the JLD of the Law Society calls for no-fault divorce

Bryan Scant is a 3 year PQE solicitor based on the south coast and specialising in private family work. He trained with a High Street firm in Poole, Dorset, before moving to work for a legal 200 firm based in Bournemouth specialising in high value matrimonial cases and disputes involving children. He is the 2017 Chair of the Junior Lawyers Division of the Law Society (JLD) which represents approximately 70,000 members from LPC students to solicitors of up to 5 years PQE.   

What was your route into the profession?

After completing my A-Levels I read law at Bournemouth University from 2006–2010, which included a placement year in a local firm of solicitors. When I had completed my LPC in London I returned to Bournemouth after accepting an offer of a training contract with the firm I worked for during my placement. 

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Qualifying into family law at a time when there were substantial cuts to legal aid and the effects of the recession were still being felt. The leap from trainee to NQ was also a substantial challenge—going from working on cases with a supervisor to suddenly running a case load independently was a steep learning curve!

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

There isn’t one person in particular. I admire solicitors who have worked their way up through the profession to become senior members of the judiciary, roles that have traditionally been held by barristers. 

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career? 

History teacher.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer? 

Any John Grisham lawyer.

What change would you make to the profession?

No-fault divorce.

How do you relax?

Unwinding with friends or walking along Bournemouth beach.

Issue: 7738 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll