header-logo header-logo

19 August 2015
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

M&S PROFILE: Katherine Gavin

katherine_gavin

The head of the defendant team at Dukes Law calls for proper access to justice

Katherine Gavin is head of the defendant team at Dukes Law, part of Fletchers Solicitors. Katherine, who has previously worked for several large defendant firms such as DWF and Silverbeck Rymer as well as Guardian Insurance, AXA, and Abbey National joined Fletchers Solicitors to help set up and run the Dukes Law defendant team.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

By far the biggest challenge I have faced in my career was moving from traditional defendant law firms to a firm that was entirely focused on claimant work. However, by making this move, I have realised that in fact lawyers on both sides are working to ensure that those people who are genuinely injured are properly compensated for their losses and injuries. Also, that representing the interest of the insurer is not in conflict with representing the interest of the lay client.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

I meet people all of the time in the profession who inspire me. I am frequently inspired by stories of seriously injured people and the way that they rebuild their lives after accidents. Some people go through some truly horrific experiences that will affect them for the rest of their lives and it is incredible to see the strength that these people have to move forward. 

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

If I wasn’t a lawyer, I would have trained to become a teacher, I have two small children and managing the school holidays is tough when working full time. I have to say, though, that I’m very lucky to work in a firm with flexible working hours as it allows me to vary my work schedule to fit in with family life. Without that I am sure it would be almost impossible to be able to manage my work and personal commitments.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

I’d say that Frank Galvin in The Verdict is my favourite fictional lawyer, it’s a great film and Paul Newman is a brilliant actor.

What change would you make to the profession?

The cuts to the legal aid budget following on from the reduction in fees for civil practitioners, has left many people with little or no access to justice. This is something I would definitely change, as everyone deserves proper access to justice.

How do you relax?

When I get time to relax, I love spending quality time with my family and planning family activities. 

Issue: 7667 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll