header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Murder law consultation launched

Legal Services

The next step in the first comprehensive review of murder law for 50 years has been announced by the Ministry of Justice.

The government is seeking views on recommendations put forward by the Law Commission following the publication of its report, Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide. It will initially look at the commission’s proposals for: reformed partial defences to murder of provocation and diminished responsibility; reformed offences of complicity in relation to homicide; and improved procedures for dealing with infanticide.

Specialists and key stakeholders from within and outside the criminal justice system are being asked for their views on the commission’s recommendations over several months. If changes to the law are considered necessary, draft clauses will be published for consultation in the summer, the government says. Joy Merriam, chairman of the Criminal Lawyer Solicitors’ Association (CLSA), says: “The CLSA has been keenly anticipating the opportunity for there to be a detailed review of the law of homicide. However, the association is still in the early stages of considering its response.

“We consider that justice is best served by ensuring that the facts are fully rehearsed before the court including all appropriate defences and the court in turn is able to have some flexibility in terms of sentence.”

Justice Minister Maria Eagle says: “Murder is the most serious crime and it is essential that the law reflects this. The government remains committed to retaining the mandatory life sentence and the sentencing principles for murder set out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003.”

This stage of the review, Eagle says, will look at specific aspects of the operation of the law of murder to ensure that it protects the public and provides appropriate levels of punishment for those found guilty. “

The law needs to be clear and fair so that people have confidence in the criminal justice system. We want to have an open and inclusive debate on the issues before we bring forward firm proposals on how the law should be reformed,” she adds.

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll