header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Murder law consultation launched

Legal Services

The next step in the first comprehensive review of murder law for 50 years has been announced by the Ministry of Justice.

The government is seeking views on recommendations put forward by the Law Commission following the publication of its report, Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide. It will initially look at the commission’s proposals for: reformed partial defences to murder of provocation and diminished responsibility; reformed offences of complicity in relation to homicide; and improved procedures for dealing with infanticide.

Specialists and key stakeholders from within and outside the criminal justice system are being asked for their views on the commission’s recommendations over several months. If changes to the law are considered necessary, draft clauses will be published for consultation in the summer, the government says. Joy Merriam, chairman of the Criminal Lawyer Solicitors’ Association (CLSA), says: “The CLSA has been keenly anticipating the opportunity for there to be a detailed review of the law of homicide. However, the association is still in the early stages of considering its response.

“We consider that justice is best served by ensuring that the facts are fully rehearsed before the court including all appropriate defences and the court in turn is able to have some flexibility in terms of sentence.”

Justice Minister Maria Eagle says: “Murder is the most serious crime and it is essential that the law reflects this. The government remains committed to retaining the mandatory life sentence and the sentencing principles for murder set out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003.”

This stage of the review, Eagle says, will look at specific aspects of the operation of the law of murder to ensure that it protects the public and provides appropriate levels of punishment for those found guilty. “

The law needs to be clear and fair so that people have confidence in the criminal justice system. We want to have an open and inclusive debate on the issues before we bring forward firm proposals on how the law should be reformed,” she adds.

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll