header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Murder law consultation launched

Legal Services

The next step in the first comprehensive review of murder law for 50 years has been announced by the Ministry of Justice.

The government is seeking views on recommendations put forward by the Law Commission following the publication of its report, Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide. It will initially look at the commission’s proposals for: reformed partial defences to murder of provocation and diminished responsibility; reformed offences of complicity in relation to homicide; and improved procedures for dealing with infanticide.

Specialists and key stakeholders from within and outside the criminal justice system are being asked for their views on the commission’s recommendations over several months. If changes to the law are considered necessary, draft clauses will be published for consultation in the summer, the government says. Joy Merriam, chairman of the Criminal Lawyer Solicitors’ Association (CLSA), says: “The CLSA has been keenly anticipating the opportunity for there to be a detailed review of the law of homicide. However, the association is still in the early stages of considering its response.

“We consider that justice is best served by ensuring that the facts are fully rehearsed before the court including all appropriate defences and the court in turn is able to have some flexibility in terms of sentence.”

Justice Minister Maria Eagle says: “Murder is the most serious crime and it is essential that the law reflects this. The government remains committed to retaining the mandatory life sentence and the sentencing principles for murder set out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003.”

This stage of the review, Eagle says, will look at specific aspects of the operation of the law of murder to ensure that it protects the public and provides appropriate levels of punishment for those found guilty. “

The law needs to be clear and fair so that people have confidence in the criminal justice system. We want to have an open and inclusive debate on the issues before we bring forward firm proposals on how the law should be reformed,” she adds.

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll