header-logo header-logo

Music and Copyright

26 June 2009 / Alistair Kelman
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Music and Copyright: Ronald S. Rosen

A more conventional work which carefully addresses the Idea/Expression dichotomy in music and the limits of protection for musical compositions—something which is lacking in the main practitioners works. Mr Rosen was the attorney for the composer John Williams who was sued for allegedly copying a phrase which he used in the score for the movie E.T.—The Extraterrestrial. After four years of litigation the dispute over a commonplace musical phrase ended successfully for Mr Williams and Mr Rosen.

The book, a practical guide, outlines the importance of expert testimony in cases involving music—and provides insights into some of the novel arguments which might today be presented in cases involving mash-ups. Its section on parody rights needs to be read by all copyright lawyers who dare to trespass on freedom of expression.
 

Reviewed by: Alistair Kelman, barrister & forsensic scientist. Longer reviews are available at www.alikelman.com

Music and Copyright
Ronald S. Rosen
Oxford University Press 2008 £107.50
ISBN-13: 978-0195338362

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll