header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009 / Alistair Kelman
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Music and Copyright

Music and Copyright: Ronald S. Rosen

A more conventional work which carefully addresses the Idea/Expression dichotomy in music and the limits of protection for musical compositions—something which is lacking in the main practitioners works. Mr Rosen was the attorney for the composer John Williams who was sued for allegedly copying a phrase which he used in the score for the movie E.T.—The Extraterrestrial. After four years of litigation the dispute over a commonplace musical phrase ended successfully for Mr Williams and Mr Rosen.

The book, a practical guide, outlines the importance of expert testimony in cases involving music—and provides insights into some of the novel arguments which might today be presented in cases involving mash-ups. Its section on parody rights needs to be read by all copyright lawyers who dare to trespass on freedom of expression.
 

Reviewed by: Alistair Kelman, barrister & forsensic scientist. Longer reviews are available at www.alikelman.com

Music and Copyright
Ronald S. Rosen
Oxford University Press 2008 £107.50
ISBN-13: 978-0195338362

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll