header-logo header-logo

Music and Copyright

26 June 2009 / Alistair Kelman
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Music and Copyright: Ronald S. Rosen

A more conventional work which carefully addresses the Idea/Expression dichotomy in music and the limits of protection for musical compositions—something which is lacking in the main practitioners works. Mr Rosen was the attorney for the composer John Williams who was sued for allegedly copying a phrase which he used in the score for the movie E.T.—The Extraterrestrial. After four years of litigation the dispute over a commonplace musical phrase ended successfully for Mr Williams and Mr Rosen.

The book, a practical guide, outlines the importance of expert testimony in cases involving music—and provides insights into some of the novel arguments which might today be presented in cases involving mash-ups. Its section on parody rights needs to be read by all copyright lawyers who dare to trespass on freedom of expression.
 

Reviewed by: Alistair Kelman, barrister & forsensic scientist. Longer reviews are available at www.alikelman.com

Music and Copyright
Ronald S. Rosen
Oxford University Press 2008 £107.50
ISBN-13: 978-0195338362

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll