header-logo header-logo

08 August 2014 / Simon Hills , Tom Metcalfe
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Mutual advantage?

specialist_public_metcalfe-hills

Simon Hills & Tom Metcalfe report on the implications of the new public procurement regime when setting up a mutual

On 11 February 2014, the Council of the European Union adopted three new directives on public procurement. Directive 2014/24/EU replaces Directive 2004/18/EC; Directive 2014/25/EU replaces Directive 2004/17/EC; and Directive 2014/23/EU was adopted on concession contracts. The directives came into force 20 working days after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

While the UK government has two years in which to integrate the directives into national law, the Cabinet Office has already announced plans to implement the new directive within much shorter timescales (Cabinet Office guidance: Transposing EU procurement directives (16 May 2014). The rationale for this is clear: to allow contracting authorities to make use of the additional flexibilities in the new directives as quickly as possible. Last year, Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude claims, commercial and procurement reforms saved taxpayers £3.8bn. This was achieved by departments collaboratively buying goods and services and enforcing sensible controls on recruitment and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll