header-logo header-logo

08 August 2014 / Simon Hills , Tom Metcalfe
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Mutual advantage?

specialist_public_metcalfe-hills

Simon Hills & Tom Metcalfe report on the implications of the new public procurement regime when setting up a mutual

On 11 February 2014, the Council of the European Union adopted three new directives on public procurement. Directive 2014/24/EU replaces Directive 2004/18/EC; Directive 2014/25/EU replaces Directive 2004/17/EC; and Directive 2014/23/EU was adopted on concession contracts. The directives came into force 20 working days after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

While the UK government has two years in which to integrate the directives into national law, the Cabinet Office has already announced plans to implement the new directive within much shorter timescales (Cabinet Office guidance: Transposing EU procurement directives (16 May 2014). The rationale for this is clear: to allow contracting authorities to make use of the additional flexibilities in the new directives as quickly as possible. Last year, Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude claims, commercial and procurement reforms saved taxpayers £3.8bn. This was achieved by departments collaboratively buying goods and services and enforcing sensible controls on recruitment and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll