header-logo header-logo

Mutual advantage?

08 August 2014 / Simon Hills , Tom Metcalfe
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
specialist_public_metcalfe-hills

Simon Hills & Tom Metcalfe report on the implications of the new public procurement regime when setting up a mutual

On 11 February 2014, the Council of the European Union adopted three new directives on public procurement. Directive 2014/24/EU replaces Directive 2004/18/EC; Directive 2014/25/EU replaces Directive 2004/17/EC; and Directive 2014/23/EU was adopted on concession contracts. The directives came into force 20 working days after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

While the UK government has two years in which to integrate the directives into national law, the Cabinet Office has already announced plans to implement the new directive within much shorter timescales (Cabinet Office guidance: Transposing EU procurement directives (16 May 2014). The rationale for this is clear: to allow contracting authorities to make use of the additional flexibilities in the new directives as quickly as possible. Last year, Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude claims, commercial and procurement reforms saved taxpayers £3.8bn. This was achieved by departments collaboratively buying goods and services and enforcing sensible controls on recruitment and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll