header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 January 2018 / Monika Byrska
Issue: 7777 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

My will, my way

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7777_speakers

Are unconventional methods of will making about to become our everyday reality? Monika Byrska considers the options

The formal requirements for a valid will are set out in s 9 of the Wills Act 1837. In layman’s terms, for a will to be valid in England and Wales, it must be in writing and it must be signed by the testator in presence of two witnesses, who must also sign it. This seems straightforward. Yet, in a survey carried out in 2015 by the Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists (ACTAPS), ‘inadvertent failure to observe formalities required for due execution’ was cited as one of the main reasons for probate and will disputes. Why?

Time to modernise?

The black letter law set out above has long been upheld in cases like Re Colling [1972] 1 WLR 1440 [1972] 3 All ER 729, or Re Groffman [1969] 1 WLR 733 [1969] 2 All ER 108. In that case, the judge was ‘perfectly satisfied that the document was intended by the deceased to be executed as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll