header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009 / Catherine Costley
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Myerson's market confidence

Declining assets are unlikely to pass the Barder test, says Catherine Costley

* * * * * *

With the credit crunch biting hard and the global economy in decline, the Court of Appeal's judgment in the case of Myerson v Myerson [2009] EWCA Civ 282, [2009] All ER (D) 05 (Apr) failed to bring relief for divorcing clients who, in more settled times, had agreed settlements involving risky assets. There are no easy solutions for clients returning to question the validity of agreements which now look like very bad deals as it is highly unlikely that the falling value of assets will be considered a Barder event (see below) which changes the basis of a financial order. Although the court may have a certain amount of sympathy for those who have lost out because of fluctuations in value, the principle of certainty and finality of capital orders will generally be upheld even in these troubled times.

Background

The original order which was made by consent after agreement was reached at the financial dispute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll