header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Nakul Dewan—20 Essex Street

Barrister to practise in Singapore following invitation from Ministry of Law

The members of 20 Essex Street have announced announce that Mr Nakul Dewan will be practising from Singapore with effect from 1 June 2014.  He will practise as an independent counsel and be based in Singapore (as well as continue his practice in India).  20 Essex Street was invited by the Ministry of Law of the Republic of Singapore to open an office in Singapore, which is housed at Maxwell Chambers.  
 
In what is a ground-breaking move for a qualified Indian and Singapore lawyer, Nakul will continue to practise and be instructed in his home jurisdictions.
 
Nakul is called to the Bar in India and Singapore. In India he practises as an independent counsel, and in Singapore from Allen & Gledhill LLP (where he will cease to practice from with effect from 30 May 2014). He is acquiring full rights to practise in the English Courts and has been invited to become a member of 20 Essex Street upon qualification.  His notable recent casework has included:

  • acting as a junior to the Solicitor General of India in the widely reported $2bn Vodafone tax dispute before the Supreme Court of India;
  • appearing for the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) before the Constitution Bench of the Indian Supreme Court in BALCO v Kaiser, where the Court overruled earlier decisions to disallow Indian courts from intervening in a foreign seated arbitration; and
  • appearing as co-counsel in a multi-million dollar arbitration in London under the LCIA Rules.

 
Nakul says: “I am delighted to have been invited to join 20 Essex Street. It is one of the leading commercial sets with an international outlook and will, I believe, be an excellent platform to continue to develop my practice.”
 
Iain Milligan QC, head of chambers at 20 Essex Street comments: “We are very pleased that Nakul will be joining 20 Essex Street.  He is a highly regarded practitioner with a wealth of experience in international arbitration, and we have no doubt that he will add a significant extra dimension to the legal services we offer.  His decision to join Chambers underlines our reputation as a forward-thinking set focused on delivering a first-class service to our clients across the globe.”

Nominations for the Halsbury Legal Awards 2014, in association with NLJ, are now open. Visit the site to view all the categories and enter online. #Halsbury2014
 

 

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll