header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Name Shame

News In Brief

The Law Society is hitting out at proposals by the Legal Complaints Service (LCS) to start publishing the complaints records on solicitors who are found to have provided inadequate professional service. The Society has issued a practice note on good practice in complaints management. Society chief executive, Des Hudson, says: “The Law Society has a different view of how one actually supports a solicitor to improve their performance. We do not name and shame them. We give them real tools which demonstrate good practice and provide them with training.” He says the LCS has not provided evidence to show it is effective within a professional context and, since the move will apply to only a small number of firms it “will not really assist clients in picking between most firms”.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll