header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Name Shame

News In Brief

The Law Society is hitting out at proposals by the Legal Complaints Service (LCS) to start publishing the complaints records on solicitors who are found to have provided inadequate professional service. The Society has issued a practice note on good practice in complaints management. Society chief executive, Des Hudson, says: “The Law Society has a different view of how one actually supports a solicitor to improve their performance. We do not name and shame them. We give them real tools which demonstrate good practice and provide them with training.” He says the LCS has not provided evidence to show it is effective within a professional context and, since the move will apply to only a small number of firms it “will not really assist clients in picking between most firms”.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll