header-logo header-logo

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

03 November 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

The National Pro Bono Centre (NPBC) has announced two key appointments ahead of national Pro Bono Week, naming Esther McConnell  (pictured) as its new chief executive officer and Sarah Oliver Scemla as a new member of its board of trustees. The appointments reflect the Centre’s commitment to strengthening governance, expanding access to justice, and fostering collaboration across the pro bono sector.

Esther brings over 15 years of experience in charity management, cross-sector leadership and policy development, with a focus on supporting vulnerable and marginalised communities. She joins from the East European Resource Centre, where as deputy CEO she oversaw services for vulnerable groups and shaped policy on labour exploitation. ‘It is an honour to be joining the National Pro Bono Centre,’ she said. ‘I am excited to work with our partners and the wider sector to build on this important work and advance access to justice across the UK.’

Sir Robin Knowles, NPBC’s board chairman, said: ‘Esther’s expertise and leadership will strengthen a sector already making a vital difference, while Sarah’s extensive pro bono experience and in-house perspective will help us broaden collaboration and innovation across the profession.’ He also thanked outgoing executive director Mary Dobson Smith for her ‘exceptional contribution’, noting that she will continue to support the NPBC in key areas.

Alongside McConnell’s appointment, Sarah Oliver Scemla brings more than 17 years of experience in global financial institutions and a strong track record in pro bono leadership. A dual-qualified solicitor in England & Wales and France, she has founded and chaired the Bank of America EMEA Pro Bono Committee and is a trustee of The Chancery Lane Project. Her addition to the board enhances the Centre’s ability to convene the legal profession and drive collaborative solutions to advance access to justice across the UK.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll