header-logo header-logo

03 November 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

The National Pro Bono Centre (NPBC) has announced two key appointments ahead of national Pro Bono Week, naming Esther McConnell  (pictured) as its new chief executive officer and Sarah Oliver Scemla as a new member of its board of trustees. The appointments reflect the Centre’s commitment to strengthening governance, expanding access to justice, and fostering collaboration across the pro bono sector.

Esther brings over 15 years of experience in charity management, cross-sector leadership and policy development, with a focus on supporting vulnerable and marginalised communities. She joins from the East European Resource Centre, where as deputy CEO she oversaw services for vulnerable groups and shaped policy on labour exploitation. ‘It is an honour to be joining the National Pro Bono Centre,’ she said. ‘I am excited to work with our partners and the wider sector to build on this important work and advance access to justice across the UK.’

Sir Robin Knowles, NPBC’s board chairman, said: ‘Esther’s expertise and leadership will strengthen a sector already making a vital difference, while Sarah’s extensive pro bono experience and in-house perspective will help us broaden collaboration and innovation across the profession.’ He also thanked outgoing executive director Mary Dobson Smith for her ‘exceptional contribution’, noting that she will continue to support the NPBC in key areas.

Alongside McConnell’s appointment, Sarah Oliver Scemla brings more than 17 years of experience in global financial institutions and a strong track record in pro bono leadership. A dual-qualified solicitor in England & Wales and France, she has founded and chaired the Bank of America EMEA Pro Bono Committee and is a trustee of The Chancery Lane Project. Her addition to the board enhances the Centre’s ability to convene the legal profession and drive collaborative solutions to advance access to justice across the UK.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll