header-logo header-logo

National security: in-person mental health hearings suspended

10 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , In Court , Mental health
printer mail-detail
Face-to-face hearings at some mental health hospitals and trust premises have been suspended as a precautionary measure

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) said this week the suspension was due to ‘some national security concerns’. It has written to more than 820 mental health hearing venues, asking for confirmation the rooms used comply with minimum safety and security requirements. Venues will be listed as ‘video hearing only’ from this week unless they have confirmed they are safe. HMCTS will regularly update the list once safety and security standards have been met at individual venues.

Practitioners whose clients cannot have a video hearing due to a medical or other reason should apply for the matter to be referred to a district tribunal judge for listing directions. In venues that are compliant, patients can continue to choose between face-to-face and video hearings.

In December, a judge at Milton Keynes County Court needed hospital treatment after an attack by a litigant in person at a closed family hearing. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll