header-logo header-logo

National security: in-person mental health hearings suspended

10 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , In Court , Mental health
printer mail-detail
Face-to-face hearings at some mental health hospitals and trust premises have been suspended as a precautionary measure

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) said this week the suspension was due to ‘some national security concerns’. It has written to more than 820 mental health hearing venues, asking for confirmation the rooms used comply with minimum safety and security requirements. Venues will be listed as ‘video hearing only’ from this week unless they have confirmed they are safe. HMCTS will regularly update the list once safety and security standards have been met at individual venues.

Practitioners whose clients cannot have a video hearing due to a medical or other reason should apply for the matter to be referred to a district tribunal judge for listing directions. In venues that are compliant, patients can continue to choose between face-to-face and video hearings.

In December, a judge at Milton Keynes County Court needed hospital treatment after an attack by a litigant in person at a closed family hearing. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll