header-logo header-logo

21 September 2012 / Richard Moorhead
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Nature or nurture?

moorhead_pic_4

Richard Moorhead wonders what makes professionals tick

The SRA has published an interesting piece of research on what might make solicitors comply with their professional obligations (SRA (2012) Attitudes to regulation and compliance in legal services). It is based on a tool developed by the Dutch Ministry of Justice for considering and monitoring regulation strategies.  It is called the Table of 11 because it breaks compliance into 11 factors suggesting that compliance can be voluntary (or spontaneous); or driven by monitoring or sanctions.

The model predicts that spontaneous compliance will depend upon:  the lawyer’s knowledge of the regulations; the cost / benefit of compliance; the degree to which regulation in the area is accepted; the loyalty and obedience of the lawyer; and the existence of informal monitoring. 

Aspects of monitoring influencing compliance include the probability a problem will be identified by informal or formal monitoring, other forms of detection and the extent to which monitoring is targeted.

Punishment makes up two elements of the model: the chance of sanctions and the severity of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll