header-logo header-logo

Nature or nurture?

21 September 2012 / Richard Moorhead
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
moorhead_pic_4

Richard Moorhead wonders what makes professionals tick

The SRA has published an interesting piece of research on what might make solicitors comply with their professional obligations (SRA (2012) Attitudes to regulation and compliance in legal services). It is based on a tool developed by the Dutch Ministry of Justice for considering and monitoring regulation strategies.  It is called the Table of 11 because it breaks compliance into 11 factors suggesting that compliance can be voluntary (or spontaneous); or driven by monitoring or sanctions.

The model predicts that spontaneous compliance will depend upon:  the lawyer’s knowledge of the regulations; the cost / benefit of compliance; the degree to which regulation in the area is accepted; the loyalty and obedience of the lawyer; and the existence of informal monitoring. 

Aspects of monitoring influencing compliance include the probability a problem will be identified by informal or formal monitoring, other forms of detection and the extent to which monitoring is targeted.

Punishment makes up two elements of the model: the chance of sanctions and the severity of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll