header-logo header-logo

Nature or nurture?

21 September 2012 / Richard Moorhead
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
moorhead_pic_4

Richard Moorhead wonders what makes professionals tick

The SRA has published an interesting piece of research on what might make solicitors comply with their professional obligations (SRA (2012) Attitudes to regulation and compliance in legal services). It is based on a tool developed by the Dutch Ministry of Justice for considering and monitoring regulation strategies.  It is called the Table of 11 because it breaks compliance into 11 factors suggesting that compliance can be voluntary (or spontaneous); or driven by monitoring or sanctions.

The model predicts that spontaneous compliance will depend upon:  the lawyer’s knowledge of the regulations; the cost / benefit of compliance; the degree to which regulation in the area is accepted; the loyalty and obedience of the lawyer; and the existence of informal monitoring. 

Aspects of monitoring influencing compliance include the probability a problem will be identified by informal or formal monitoring, other forms of detection and the extent to which monitoring is targeted.

Punishment makes up two elements of the model: the chance of sanctions and the severity of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll