header-logo header-logo

Nature or nurture?

21 September 2012 / Richard Moorhead
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
moorhead_pic_4

Richard Moorhead wonders what makes professionals tick

The SRA has published an interesting piece of research on what might make solicitors comply with their professional obligations (SRA (2012) Attitudes to regulation and compliance in legal services). It is based on a tool developed by the Dutch Ministry of Justice for considering and monitoring regulation strategies.  It is called the Table of 11 because it breaks compliance into 11 factors suggesting that compliance can be voluntary (or spontaneous); or driven by monitoring or sanctions.

The model predicts that spontaneous compliance will depend upon:  the lawyer’s knowledge of the regulations; the cost / benefit of compliance; the degree to which regulation in the area is accepted; the loyalty and obedience of the lawyer; and the existence of informal monitoring. 

Aspects of monitoring influencing compliance include the probability a problem will be identified by informal or formal monitoring, other forms of detection and the extent to which monitoring is targeted.

Punishment makes up two elements of the model: the chance of sanctions and the severity of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll