header-logo header-logo

23 March 2018 / James Tipler , Caroline Shea KC
Issue: 7786 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Navigating the lease renewals pilot

Caroline Shea QC & James Tipler consider the likely impact of a new pilot scheme on unopposed business lease renewal claims

  • Under a new pilot scheme, unopposed 1954 Act lease renewals issued in central London will be dealt with by the First-tier Tribunal.
  • Standard form directions will apply.

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is something of a beacon of continuity amidst the shifting tides of landlord and tenant law; in contrast to the regulation of residential tenancies, with which successive governments of all political hues have tinkered endlessly, the primary statutory regime governing business leases in England and Wales has remained in substantially the same form for well over half a century now.

However, changes are afoot that may radically alter the procedures in place to govern claims made under the 1954 Act for new leases where the landlord is not opposed to the grant of the new lease (unopposed lease renewals).

It is uncommon for such claims to go all the way to trial. Typically, following service

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll