header-logo header-logo

A neat alternative

28 April 2011 / George Woods
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

A director’s guarantee is a useful option where a security for costs application is likely to be rejected, says George Woods

Applications for security for costs are usually made early in the proceedings and applicants are encouraged not to leave them until the trial approaches.
In Inventors Friend v Leathes Prior [unreported] an application was made two weeks before the anticipated trial date for the substantive claim and was heard less than one week before that date. The claimant argued that such an application was late and would stifle the claim. The defendant agreed to accept a personal guarantee from a director of the claimant rather than require the sums actually be raised.

The court felt such an order would not stifle the claim, and gave the defendant some comfort as to payment of its costs. Any risk as to the value of such a guarantee fell on the defendant who was happy to accept such a risk as a price of obtaining the order.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Pensions litigation team announces senior associate hire

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Firm appoints new chief financial officer

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Social purpose firm announces director hire plus eight promotions

NEWS
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll