header-logo header-logo

28 April 2011 / George Woods
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

A neat alternative

A director’s guarantee is a useful option where a security for costs application is likely to be rejected, says George Woods

Applications for security for costs are usually made early in the proceedings and applicants are encouraged not to leave them until the trial approaches.
In Inventors Friend v Leathes Prior [unreported] an application was made two weeks before the anticipated trial date for the substantive claim and was heard less than one week before that date. The claimant argued that such an application was late and would stifle the claim. The defendant agreed to accept a personal guarantee from a director of the claimant rather than require the sums actually be raised.

The court felt such an order would not stifle the claim, and gave the defendant some comfort as to payment of its costs. Any risk as to the value of such a guarantee fell on the defendant who was happy to accept such a risk as a price of obtaining the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll