header-logo header-logo

14 December 2009
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Need for Forced Marriage Protection Orders shown in first year

More people have been protected by Forced Marriage Protection Orders than originally expected in their first year of operation.

More people have been protected by Forced Marriage Protection Orders than originally expected in their first year of operation.

Eighty-six have been issued, compared to the predicted total of 50, since the protection orders were introduced in November 2008.

The orders are tailored to individual cases and are used to prevent a forced marriage from occurring or to offer protective measures where a forced marriage has already taken place.

They can be used to confiscate a passport to stop someone being taken out of the country, or to disclose someone’s whereabouts and return them to the UK if they have already been taken abroad.

Justice Minister Bridget Prentice says: “There is no doubt in my mind that we have provided a remedy to respond to a genuine need.”

Commander Steve Allen, the ACPO lead on forced marriage and honour based violence says: “The new legislation has been one of the most important developments I have seen in this work.

“Not only does it provide us with a flexible means of protecting vulnerable people but it also sends a message in the clearest possible terms that such abuses are outside the boundaries of acceptable behaviour.”

The government set up a Forced Marriage Unit in 2005 to help victims and assist professionals working in this area. The Honour Network, part-funded by the FMU, offers emotional and practical support, and hosts a helpline which is manned solely by survivors of honour-based violence and forced marriage.

The Network also works with embassy staff to rescue victims, who may have been held captive, raped, forced into a marriage or made to have an abortion.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll