header-logo header-logo

01 November 2013
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Negligence—Duty to take care—Non-delegable duty

Woodland v Essex County Council [2013] UKSC 66, [2013] All ER (D) 252 (Oct)

Supreme Court, Lady Hale DP, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson SCJJ, 23 Oct 2013

The duty of care owed by a school to children undergoing swimming lessons inside school hours is non-delegable. 

Christopher Melton QC and Ian Little (instructed by Pannone LLP) for the appellant. Steven Ford QC and Adam Weitzman (instructed by Essex County Council Legal Services) for the authority.

The appellant attended a primary school which was under the control of the respondent local education authority. Pupils had swimming lessons in school hours. The appellant and members of her class went to the pool, accompanied by a class teacher, H. The group to which the appellant was assigned was taught by a swimming teacher, B. Also in attendance was a lifeguard, M. Neither B nor M were employed by the school and their services had been provided to the authority by S, who was an independent contractor who carried on an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll