header-logo header-logo

Negligence—Duty to take care—Non-delegable duty

01 November 2013
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Woodland v Essex County Council [2013] UKSC 66, [2013] All ER (D) 252 (Oct)

Supreme Court, Lady Hale DP, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson SCJJ, 23 Oct 2013

The duty of care owed by a school to children undergoing swimming lessons inside school hours is non-delegable. 

Christopher Melton QC and Ian Little (instructed by Pannone LLP) for the appellant. Steven Ford QC and Adam Weitzman (instructed by Essex County Council Legal Services) for the authority.

The appellant attended a primary school which was under the control of the respondent local education authority. Pupils had swimming lessons in school hours. The appellant and members of her class went to the pool, accompanied by a class teacher, H. The group to which the appellant was assigned was taught by a swimming teacher, B. Also in attendance was a lifeguard, M. Neither B nor M were employed by the school and their services had been provided to the authority by S, who was an independent contractor who carried on an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll