header-logo header-logo

26 July 2007 / Kuljit Bhogal
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Neighbour hell

Is this the end for disruptive residential premises?
Kuljit Bhogal reports

The government has recently announced proposals for the introduction of premises closure orders for premises whose occupants have been engaging in non-drugs related anti-social behaviour.

Currently, under the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003 (ABA 2003), s 1, police officers not below the rank of superintendent may serve a closure notice if they have reasonable grounds for believing that:
- at any time during the relevant period the premises have been used in connection with the unlawful use, production or supply of a class A controlled drug; and
- the use of the premises is associated with the occurrence of disorder or serious nuisance to members of the public.

If a closure notice has been issued, the police must make an application for a closure order. The application is made to the magistrates’ court and must be heard not later than 48 hours after the closure notice was served. The magistrates’ court may only make a closure order if it is satisfied that each of the following applies under ABA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll