header-logo header-logo

Neurodiversity & a shocking litany of wrongful convictions

29 July 2022 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail
89111
The justice system cruelly stacks the odds against the neurodivergent, says Jon Robins

As many as one in four prisoners in Britain could have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), according to a report published by the charity, ADHD Foundation last month. The group argues ADHD is ‘critically under-diagnosed’ and, if managed properly, could lead to a reduction in criminality of 32% for men and 41% for women. The research is the latest in a series of studies drawing attention to how little understood, in terms of implications for the criminal justice system (CJS), are the conditions that fall under the broad umbrella of ‘neurodiversity’.

A major study by three criminal justice inspectorates published last year estimated that as many as half of all people going into prison could be neurodivergent. ‘We were struck by the number of times the word “difficult” was used in evidence,’ wrote Charlie Taylor, Justin Russell and Sir Thomas Winsor, chief inspectors of prisons, probation and constabulary respectively. They went on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll