header-logo header-logo

29 July 2022 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Neurodiversity & a shocking litany of wrongful convictions

89111
The justice system cruelly stacks the odds against the neurodivergent, says Jon Robins

As many as one in four prisoners in Britain could have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), according to a report published by the charity, ADHD Foundation last month. The group argues ADHD is ‘critically under-diagnosed’ and, if managed properly, could lead to a reduction in criminality of 32% for men and 41% for women. The research is the latest in a series of studies drawing attention to how little understood, in terms of implications for the criminal justice system (CJS), are the conditions that fall under the broad umbrella of ‘neurodiversity’.

A major study by three criminal justice inspectorates published last year estimated that as many as half of all people going into prison could be neurodivergent. ‘We were struck by the number of times the word “difficult” was used in evidence,’ wrote Charlie Taylor, Justin Russell and Sir Thomas Winsor, chief inspectors of prisons, probation and constabulary respectively. They went on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll