header-logo header-logo

29 July 2022 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Neurodiversity & a shocking litany of wrongful convictions

89111
The justice system cruelly stacks the odds against the neurodivergent, says Jon Robins

As many as one in four prisoners in Britain could have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), according to a report published by the charity, ADHD Foundation last month. The group argues ADHD is ‘critically under-diagnosed’ and, if managed properly, could lead to a reduction in criminality of 32% for men and 41% for women. The research is the latest in a series of studies drawing attention to how little understood, in terms of implications for the criminal justice system (CJS), are the conditions that fall under the broad umbrella of ‘neurodiversity’.

A major study by three criminal justice inspectorates published last year estimated that as many as half of all people going into prison could be neurodivergent. ‘We were struck by the number of times the word “difficult” was used in evidence,’ wrote Charlie Taylor, Justin Russell and Sir Thomas Winsor, chief inspectors of prisons, probation and constabulary respectively. They went on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll