header-logo header-logo

New court structure?

26 July 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

"Public interest corporation" could take over the courts

The government is considering handing over the running of the courts and tribunal system to an “independent public interest corporation”.

In a letter sent to judges this week, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling, the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge and the senior president of tribunals Sir Jeremy Sullivan say: “A variety of difficult decisions will be required as to the appropriate level at which fees are set and about how best to deliver access to justice and value for money for the taxpayer.”

They are considering “whether the current structures could be transformed” or “whether an alternative structure, such as a more independent public interest corporation, would better ensure a sustainable future”. The aim would be “to ensure adequate investment and where consistent with the administration of justice, options to generate and retain additional income and capital for investment”.

However, they pledge not to erode the constitutional principles underpinning the administration of justice.

They state: “We are not and will not be exploring any options which will involve shareholders, the making of a profit or surplus or contracting out or profit-making on the basis of judicial and linked administrative functions, other than for the exclusive purpose of investing any surplus into the administration of justice.

“No replacement organisation for HMCTS would be contemplated unless it was a body operated solely in the public interest.”

In May, the Ministry of Justice denied it had plans for the “wholesale privatisation” of the courts and tribunals service. In March, Grayling said the MoJ was looking for ways to “raise the revenue and investment” necessary for modernisation.

Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll