header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Max Withington
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A new direction for credit hire

nlj_7763_withington

Max Withington believes proposed model directions to be used in credit hire cases are on the right track

The Civil Procedure Rules Committee consultation on proposed model directions to be used in credit hire cases closed in early August and the feedback is now being analysed. There were a number of features in the proposed draft which were encouraging. In particular the proposal that credit hire provisions on disclosure and witness evidence be dealt with early in proceedings as distinct steps from the rest of the directions, and that the order’s provisions are to apply to all tracks.

Anything which seeks to reduce the amount and costs of credit hire litigation is to be welcomed. The consultation has incited a hopeful response in that any order introduced would substantially reduce or eliminate the satellite litigation and frictional costs currently being expended on the issue of directions and disclosure. But to do so, the order will need to create certainty and consistency around the evidential requirements on both sides, setting them out in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll