header-logo header-logo

New family standards set

23 May 2013
Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ aim to ensure quality of expert evidence in family cases

Child care experts giving evidence in family courts will have to comply with new national standards, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced.

The MoJ said the move would reverse the “increasing trend” for experts to provide “unnecessary and costly evidence” in the form of further written statements, clarifications and additional court appearances, which can delay child care cases.

Under the standards, only “qualified, experienced and recognised professionals” will be allowed to give evidence.

Family justice minister, Lord McNally says: “Poor quality expert evidence can lead to unacceptable delays for children and their families. By putting standards in place we will ensure only the highest calibre of evidence is permitted in family proceedings.”

A nine-week consultation, due to close on 18 July, has been jointly launched by the Family Justice Council and the MoJ. It follows Sir David Norgrove’s review of family justice, which found some poor quality expert evidence being put forward.

Dr Heather Payne, chair of the Family Justice Council’s Experts Working Group, which drafted the standards says: “The standards are designed to improve the quality, supply and use of expertise to improve outcomes for children in the family courts.”

According to the MoJ, the average time for care cases to be concluded has already been reduced from 56 weeks to 45 weeks. It aims to bring the tie down to 26 weeks. £52m in legal aid was spent on expert reports in child care cases in the 12 months up to October 2011.

Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll