header-logo header-logo

New family standards set

23 May 2013
Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ aim to ensure quality of expert evidence in family cases

Child care experts giving evidence in family courts will have to comply with new national standards, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced.

The MoJ said the move would reverse the “increasing trend” for experts to provide “unnecessary and costly evidence” in the form of further written statements, clarifications and additional court appearances, which can delay child care cases.

Under the standards, only “qualified, experienced and recognised professionals” will be allowed to give evidence.

Family justice minister, Lord McNally says: “Poor quality expert evidence can lead to unacceptable delays for children and their families. By putting standards in place we will ensure only the highest calibre of evidence is permitted in family proceedings.”

A nine-week consultation, due to close on 18 July, has been jointly launched by the Family Justice Council and the MoJ. It follows Sir David Norgrove’s review of family justice, which found some poor quality expert evidence being put forward.

Dr Heather Payne, chair of the Family Justice Council’s Experts Working Group, which drafted the standards says: “The standards are designed to improve the quality, supply and use of expertise to improve outcomes for children in the family courts.”

According to the MoJ, the average time for care cases to be concluded has already been reduced from 56 weeks to 45 weeks. It aims to bring the tie down to 26 weeks. £52m in legal aid was spent on expert reports in child care cases in the 12 months up to October 2011.

Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll