header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007 / Jonathan Rogers
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The new homicide ladder

Jonathan Rogers finds some brave proposals in the Law Commission’s review of homicide, but bemoans its stubborn refusal to address mercy killings

 The Law Commission (the commission) published its report on the reform of homicide, Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide (Law Com No 304) (the report), on 28 November 2006. The commission has stuck to its original proposals of subdividing murder into ‘first degree murder’ and ‘second degree murder’, and now awaits the Home Office to carry out its own consultation and to produce a draft Bill.

First and second degree murder

First degree murder would now be committed not only by those who intended to kill but also by those who intended serious injury with an awareness of a serious risk of death. This would continue to attract the mandatory life sentence. Second degree murder, which would carry a discretionary life sentence, would be committed by those who have the mens rea for first degree murder but have one of the existing partial defences, namely provocation, diminished responsibility, suicide pact killing or infanticide. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll