header-logo header-logo

The new homicide ladder

11 January 2007 / Jonathan Rogers
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Rogers finds some brave proposals in the Law Commission’s review of homicide, but bemoans its stubborn refusal to address mercy killings

 The Law Commission (the commission) published its report on the reform of homicide, Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide (Law Com No 304) (the report), on 28 November 2006. The commission has stuck to its original proposals of subdividing murder into ‘first degree murder’ and ‘second degree murder’, and now awaits the Home Office to carry out its own consultation and to produce a draft Bill.

First and second degree murder

First degree murder would now be committed not only by those who intended to kill but also by those who intended serious injury with an awareness of a serious risk of death. This would continue to attract the mandatory life sentence. Second degree murder, which would carry a discretionary life sentence, would be committed by those who have the mens rea for first degree murder but have one of the existing partial defences, namely provocation, diminished responsibility, suicide pact killing or infanticide. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll