header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007 / Jonathan Rogers
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The new homicide ladder

Jonathan Rogers finds some brave proposals in the Law Commission’s review of homicide, but bemoans its stubborn refusal to address mercy killings

 The Law Commission (the commission) published its report on the reform of homicide, Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide (Law Com No 304) (the report), on 28 November 2006. The commission has stuck to its original proposals of subdividing murder into ‘first degree murder’ and ‘second degree murder’, and now awaits the Home Office to carry out its own consultation and to produce a draft Bill.

First and second degree murder

First degree murder would now be committed not only by those who intended to kill but also by those who intended serious injury with an awareness of a serious risk of death. This would continue to attract the mandatory life sentence. Second degree murder, which would carry a discretionary life sentence, would be committed by those who have the mens rea for first degree murder but have one of the existing partial defences, namely provocation, diminished responsibility, suicide pact killing or infanticide. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll