header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007 / Jonathan Rogers
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The new homicide ladder

Jonathan Rogers finds some brave proposals in the Law Commission’s review of homicide, but bemoans its stubborn refusal to address mercy killings

 The Law Commission (the commission) published its report on the reform of homicide, Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide (Law Com No 304) (the report), on 28 November 2006. The commission has stuck to its original proposals of subdividing murder into ‘first degree murder’ and ‘second degree murder’, and now awaits the Home Office to carry out its own consultation and to produce a draft Bill.

First and second degree murder

First degree murder would now be committed not only by those who intended to kill but also by those who intended serious injury with an awareness of a serious risk of death. This would continue to attract the mandatory life sentence. Second degree murder, which would carry a discretionary life sentence, would be committed by those who have the mens rea for first degree murder but have one of the existing partial defences, namely provocation, diminished responsibility, suicide pact killing or infanticide. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll