header-logo header-logo

The new litigation landscape

28 October 2010 / Jovita Vassallo
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Part 2: Jovita Vassallo turns the spotlight on evidence & trials

The exchange of witness evidence is a critical stage in the run-up to trial. It is a prime moment for lawyers to assess rigorously the strengths and weakness of not only their client’s case, but, imperatively, also the opponent’s. Never forget that your client’s (and the court’s) view will almost always be that the best outcome for litigation is to avoid the trial altogether! The satisfaction of a “day in court” is an outmoded idea; the costs, stresses and strains of the run-up to trial can be stifling. A critical appraisal of all the evidence can take you a long way towards making the right decisions.

A tactical advantage

CPR 32, 33 and 34 are your bible. They cover the preparation and service of witness statements and other evidence and the cross-examination of witnesses at trial. 

  • There is no property in a witness. Practitioners should not therefore be put off approaching unwilling or conflicted third parties. Witness summonses (CPR 34.2) make great
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll