header-logo header-logo

28 October 2010 / Jovita Vassallo
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

The new litigation landscape

Part 2: Jovita Vassallo turns the spotlight on evidence & trials

The exchange of witness evidence is a critical stage in the run-up to trial. It is a prime moment for lawyers to assess rigorously the strengths and weakness of not only their client’s case, but, imperatively, also the opponent’s. Never forget that your client’s (and the court’s) view will almost always be that the best outcome for litigation is to avoid the trial altogether! The satisfaction of a “day in court” is an outmoded idea; the costs, stresses and strains of the run-up to trial can be stifling. A critical appraisal of all the evidence can take you a long way towards making the right decisions.

A tactical advantage

CPR 32, 33 and 34 are your bible. They cover the preparation and service of witness statements and other evidence and the cross-examination of witnesses at trial. 

  • There is no property in a witness. Practitioners should not therefore be put off approaching unwilling or conflicted third parties. Witness summonses (CPR 34.2) make great
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll