header-logo header-logo

The new litigation landscape

28 October 2010 / Jovita Vassallo
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Part 2: Jovita Vassallo turns the spotlight on evidence & trials

The exchange of witness evidence is a critical stage in the run-up to trial. It is a prime moment for lawyers to assess rigorously the strengths and weakness of not only their client’s case, but, imperatively, also the opponent’s. Never forget that your client’s (and the court’s) view will almost always be that the best outcome for litigation is to avoid the trial altogether! The satisfaction of a “day in court” is an outmoded idea; the costs, stresses and strains of the run-up to trial can be stifling. A critical appraisal of all the evidence can take you a long way towards making the right decisions.

A tactical advantage

CPR 32, 33 and 34 are your bible. They cover the preparation and service of witness statements and other evidence and the cross-examination of witnesses at trial. 

  • There is no property in a witness. Practitioners should not therefore be put off approaching unwilling or conflicted third parties. Witness summonses (CPR 34.2) make great
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll